Bram Yvahk wrote:
> Steffen Klassert wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 11:37:55PM +, Bram Yvahk wrote:
>>> We've experienced an issue with VTI when the path-mtu is smaller than
> the size
>>> of the "client" packet.
>>>
>>> What happens: IPv4 packet from the client (i.e. another system in the
>
Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 11:37:55PM +, Bram Yvahk wrote:
>> We've experienced an issue with VTI when the path-mtu is smaller than
the size
>> of the "client" packet.
>>
>> What happens: IPv4 packet from the client (i.e. another system in the
LAN)
>> attempts to transmit
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 11:37:55PM +, Bram Yvahk wrote:
> We've experienced an issue with VTI when the path-mtu is smaller than the size
> of the "client" packet.
>
> What happens: IPv4 packet from the client (i.e. another system in the LAN)
> attempts to transmit some data; IPv4 header shows
We've experienced an issue with VTI when the path-mtu is smaller than the size
of the "client" packet.
What happens: IPv4 packet from the client (i.e. another system in the LAN)
attempts to transmit some data; IPv4 header shows that 'DF' bit is not set but
still the client receives ICMPv4 "need-to
