Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ip-xfrm: Add support for OUTPUT_MARK

2018-06-12 Thread Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
Have you considered putting this earlier up in the output, where the mark is printed as well? + if (tb[XFRMA_OUTPUT_MARK]) { + __u32 output_mark = rta_getattr_u32(tb[XFRMA_OUTPUT_MARK]); + + fprintf(fp, "\toutput-mark 0x%x %s", output_mark, _SL_); + }

Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ip-xfrm: Add support for OUTPUT_MARK

2018-06-12 Thread Steffen Klassert
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:33:41AM +0900, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:12 AM Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan > wrote: > > > > This patch adds support for OUTPUT_MARK in xfrm state to exercise the > > functionality added by kernel commit 077fbac405bf > > ("net: xfrm: support s

Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ip-xfrm: Add support for OUTPUT_MARK

2018-06-11 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:11:33 -0600 Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote: > This patch adds support for OUTPUT_MARK in xfrm state to exercise the > functionality added by kernel commit 077fbac405bf > ("net: xfrm: support setting an output mark."). > > Sample output with output-mark - > > src 192

Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ip-xfrm: Add support for OUTPUT_MARK

2018-06-11 Thread Lorenzo Colitti
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:12 AM Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote: > > This patch adds support for OUTPUT_MARK in xfrm state to exercise the > functionality added by kernel commit 077fbac405bf > ("net: xfrm: support setting an output mark."). > > Sample output with output-mark - > > src 192.16

[PATCH iproute2-next] ip-xfrm: Add support for OUTPUT_MARK

2018-06-11 Thread Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
This patch adds support for OUTPUT_MARK in xfrm state to exercise the functionality added by kernel commit 077fbac405bf ("net: xfrm: support setting an output mark."). Sample output with output-mark - src 192.168.1.1 dst 192.168.1.2 proto esp spi 0x4321 reqid 0 mode tunnel rep