On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 13:55 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:22:29 -0700
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > Lets prepare for a possibility to have 64bit inode numbers for sockets,
> > even if the kernel currently enforces 32bit numbers.
> >
> > Presu
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:22:29 -0700
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> Lets prepare for a possibility to have 64bit inode numbers for sockets,
> even if the kernel currently enforces 32bit numbers.
>
> Presumably, if both kernel and userland are 64bit (no 32bit emulation),
> kernel co
From: Eric Dumazet
Lets prepare for a possibility to have 64bit inode numbers for sockets,
even if the kernel currently enforces 32bit numbers.
Presumably, if both kernel and userland are 64bit (no 32bit emulation),
kernel could switch to 64bit inode numbers soon.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
-