On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 09:32:44AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/21/19 12:32 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > Are we going to patch the kernel to accept a flag it is not using or are
> > we going to patch iproute2 to not send it?
>
> Stephen merged this patch to master; I merged to next. should be g
On 1/21/19 12:32 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Are we going to patch the kernel to accept a flag it is not using or are
> we going to patch iproute2 to not send it?
Stephen merged this patch to master; I merged to next. should be good now.
On 1/21/19 12:32 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 09:29:51AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 1/14/19 9:05 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:54:06 -0800
>>> Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>
Kernel ignores the RTM_F_LOOKUP_TABLE flag for all families
but IPv
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 09:29:51AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/14/19 9:05 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:54:06 -0800
> > Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >
> >> Kernel ignores the RTM_F_LOOKUP_TABLE flag for all families
> >> but IPv4. Don't set it, otherwise it may fall fou
On 1/14/19 9:05 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:54:06 -0800
> Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
>> Kernel ignores the RTM_F_LOOKUP_TABLE flag for all families
>> but IPv4. Don't set it, otherwise it may fall foul of
>> strict checking policies.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
>
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:54:06 -0800
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Kernel ignores the RTM_F_LOOKUP_TABLE flag for all families
> but IPv4. Don't set it, otherwise it may fall foul of
> strict checking policies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
Doing the right thing is a good idea, but really I can't
Kernel ignores the RTM_F_LOOKUP_TABLE flag for all families
but IPv4. Don't set it, otherwise it may fall foul of
strict checking policies.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
---
ip/iproute.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ip/iproute.c b/ip/iproute.c
index 044