On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:44 AM David Verbeiren
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:55 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> wrote:
> > Looks good, but would be good to have a unit test (see below). Maybe
> > in a follow up.
>
> Here is the associated new selftest, implementing the sequence you
> proposed (than
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:55 PM Andrii Nakryiko
wrote:
> Looks good, but would be good to have a unit test (see below). Maybe
> in a follow up.
Here is the associated new selftest, implementing the sequence you
proposed (thanks for that!), and also one for LRU case:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/2
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 3:15 PM David Verbeiren
wrote:
>
> Zero-fill element values for all other cpus than current, just as
> when not using prealloc. This is the only way the bpf program can
> ensure known initial values for all cpus ('onallcpus' cannot be
> set when coming from the bpf program)
Zero-fill element values for all other cpus than current, just as
when not using prealloc. This is the only way the bpf program can
ensure known initial values for all cpus ('onallcpus' cannot be
set when coming from the bpf program).
The scenario is: bpf program inserts some elements in a per-cpu
