2018-05-30 13:00 GMT+02:00 Daniel Borkmann :
>> Instead of doing this inside the helper you can reject the program already
>> in the lwt_*_func_proto() by returning NULL when !CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF. That
>> way programs get rejected at verification time instead of runtime, so the
>> user can probe a
On 05/24/2018 12:18 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 05/20/2018 03:58 PM, Mathieu Xhonneux wrote:
>> The BPF seg6local hook should be powerful enough to enable users to
>> implement most of the use-cases one could think of. After some thinking,
>> we figured out that the following actions should be
On 05/20/2018 03:58 PM, Mathieu Xhonneux wrote:
> The BPF seg6local hook should be powerful enough to enable users to
> implement most of the use-cases one could think of. After some thinking,
> we figured out that the following actions should be possible on a SRv6
> packet, requiring 3 specific he
The BPF seg6local hook should be powerful enough to enable users to
implement most of the use-cases one could think of. After some thinking,
we figured out that the following actions should be possible on a SRv6
packet, requiring 3 specific helpers :
- bpf_lwt_seg6_store_bytes: Modify non-sensi
