2018-05-18 21:24 GMT+01:00 Daniel Borkmann :
>> +#define MAX_PROG_NAME 256
>> +static const struct nla_policy bpf_prog_policy[LWT_BPF_PROG_MAX + 1] = {
>> + [LWT_BPF_PROG_FD] = { .type = NLA_U32, },
>
> From UAPI point of view, I wouldn't name it LWT_BPF_PROG_FD but rather
> something like
>
On 05/17/2018 04:28 PM, Mathieu Xhonneux wrote:
> This patch adds the End.BPF action to the LWT seg6local infrastructure.
> This action works like any other seg6local End action, meaning that an IPv6
> header with SRH is needed, whose DA has to be equal to the SID of the
> action. It will also adva
This patch adds the End.BPF action to the LWT seg6local infrastructure.
This action works like any other seg6local End action, meaning that an IPv6
header with SRH is needed, whose DA has to be equal to the SID of the
action. It will also advance the SRH to the next segment, the BPF program
does no
