On 2019-08-22 04:44, Kevin Laatz wrote:
> Currently, addresses are chunk size aligned. This means, we are very
> restricted in terms of where we can place chunk within the umem. For
> example, if we have a chunk size of 2k, then our chunks can only be placed
> at 0,2k,4k,6k,8k... and so on (ie. eve
On 22/08/2019 19:43, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
On 21 Aug 2019, at 18:44, Kevin Laatz wrote:
Currently, addresses are chunk size aligned. This means, we are very
restricted in terms of where we can place chunk within the umem. For
example, if we have a chunk size of 2k, then our chunks can only be
p
On 21 Aug 2019, at 18:44, Kevin Laatz wrote:
Currently, addresses are chunk size aligned. This means, we are very
restricted in terms of where we can place chunk within the umem. For
example, if we have a chunk size of 2k, then our chunks can only be
placed
at 0,2k,4k,6k,8k... and so on (ie
Currently, addresses are chunk size aligned. This means, we are very
restricted in terms of where we can place chunk within the umem. For
example, if we have a chunk size of 2k, then our chunks can only be placed
at 0,2k,4k,6k,8k... and so on (ie. every 2k starting from 0).
This patch introduces t
