Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] bpf: selftests: add MPTCP test base

Hi Song, Thanks for the feedback ! On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Song Liu wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 8:02 AM Nicolas Rybowski > wrote: > > > > This patch adds a base for MPTCP specific tests. > > > > It is currently limited to the is_mptcp field in case of plain TCP > > connection bec

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] bpf: selftests: add MPTCP test base

> On Sep 15, 2020, at 9:35 AM, Nicolas Rybowski > wrote: > > Hi Song, > > Thanks for the feedback ! > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Song Liu wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 8:02 AM Nicolas Rybowski >> wrote: >>> >>> This patch adds a base for MPTCP specific tests. >>> >>> It i

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] bpf: selftests: add MPTCP test base

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 8:02 AM Nicolas Rybowski wrote: > > This patch adds a base for MPTCP specific tests. > > It is currently limited to the is_mptcp field in case of plain TCP > connection because for the moment there is no easy way to get the subflow > sk from a msk in userspace. This implies

[PATCH bpf-next v2 4/5] bpf: selftests: add MPTCP test base

This patch adds a base for MPTCP specific tests. It is currently limited to the is_mptcp field in case of plain TCP connection because for the moment there is no easy way to get the subflow sk from a msk in userspace. This implies that we cannot lookup the sk_storage attached to the subflow sk in