On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 9:43 AM Nicolas Rybowski
wrote:
>
> It has been observed that the kernel sockets created for the subflows
> (except the first one) are not in the same cgroup as their parents.
> That's because the additional subflows are created by kernel workers.
>
> This is a problem with
It has been observed that the kernel sockets created for the subflows
(except the first one) are not in the same cgroup as their parents.
That's because the additional subflows are created by kernel workers.
This is a problem with eBPF programs attached to the parent's
cgroup won't be executed for
