Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] load-acquire/store-release barriers for AF_XDP rings

2021-03-06 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master): On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 10:41:11 +0100 you wrote: > This two-patch series introduces load-acquire/store-release barriers > for the AF_XDP rings. > > For most contemporary architectures, this is more effective than a > SPSC ring

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] load-acquire/store-release barriers for AF_XDP rings

2021-03-05 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Björn Töpel writes: > This two-patch series introduces load-acquire/store-release barriers > for the AF_XDP rings. > > For most contemporary architectures, this is more effective than a > SPSC ring based on smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers. More importantly, > load-acquire/store-release semantics make the

[PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] load-acquire/store-release barriers for AF_XDP rings

2021-03-05 Thread Björn Töpel
This two-patch series introduces load-acquire/store-release barriers for the AF_XDP rings. For most contemporary architectures, this is more effective than a SPSC ring based on smp_{r,w,}mb() barriers. More importantly, load-acquire/store-release semantics make the ring code easier to follow. Thi