On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 23:29:59 -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> On 10/8/2019 5:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > I asked you to add numbers for handling those use cases in the kernel
> > directly.
>
> Forgot to explicitly mention that I didn't see any regressions with
> xdp1, xdp2 or xdpsock in d
On 10/8/2019 1:05 AM, Björn Töpel wrote:
On 2019-10-08 08:16, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
This is a rework of the following patch series
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1565840783-8269-1-git-send-email-sridhar.samudr...@intel.com/#r
that tried to enable direct receive by bypassing XDP program att
On 10/8/2019 5:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 23:16:51 -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
This is a rework of the following patch series
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1565840783-8269-1-git-send-email-sridhar.samudr...@intel.com/#r
that tried to enable direct receive by bypassi
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 23:16:51 -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> This is a rework of the following patch series
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1565840783-8269-1-git-send-email-sridhar.samudr...@intel.com/#r
> that tried to enable direct receive by bypassing XDP program attached
> to the device.
>
On 2019-10-08 08:16, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
This is a rework of the following patch series
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1565840783-8269-1-git-send-email-sridhar.samudr...@intel.com/#r
that tried to enable direct receive by bypassing XDP program attached
to the device.
Based on the community
This is a rework of the following patch series
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1565840783-8269-1-git-send-email-sridhar.samudr...@intel.com/#r
that tried to enable direct receive by bypassing XDP program attached
to the device.
Based on the community feedback and some suggestions from Bjorn, chang
