On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:43 AM Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>
> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
Applied. Thanks
On 4/10/19 9:38 PM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>>
>> Notice the "No route to host" errors.
>
> "No route to host" is OK: there are negative tests, as you requested a
> couple of months ago... :), and these tests correctly trigger "no
> route to host".
>
> This output basically tell me that the test pa
Your test output tells me that everything is OK - see below.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:17 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 4/10/19 6:26 PM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:19 PM David Ahern wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/3/19 8:43 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> >>> This patch adds tests vali
On 4/10/19 6:26 PM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:19 PM David Ahern wrote:
>>
>> On 4/3/19 8:43 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>>> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
>>> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:19 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 4/3/19 8:43 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> > This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
> > encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_enc
On 4/3/19 8:43 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh| 134 +++---
> 1 file changed, 86 inserti
On 4/9/19 2:48 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 04/05/2019 04:32 AM, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 4/3/19 9:43 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>>> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
>>> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
>>> ---
>>>
On 04/05/2019 04:32 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 4/3/19 9:43 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
>> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
>> ---
>> .../selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh| 13
On 4/3/19 9:43 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh| 134 +++---
> 1 file changed, 86 inserti
On 4/3/19 11:09 PM, Martin Lau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:43:38AM -0700, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
>> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
> LGTM. David Ahern, please review also.
>
looked at it last night and hit so
On 4/3/19 11:09 PM, Martin Lau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:43:38AM -0700, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
>> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
> LGTM. David Ahern, please review also.
>
looking at it last night and hit s
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 08:43:38AM -0700, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
> encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
LGTM. David Ahern, please review also.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau
This patch adds tests validating that VRF and BPF-LWT
encap work together well, as requested by David Ahern.
Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov
---
.../selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh| 134 +++---
1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/sel
13 matches
Mail list logo
