Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: use AF_LOCAL instead of AF_INET in xsk.c

2021-02-12 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master): On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:18:26 -0800 you wrote: > We have the environments where usage of AF_INET is prohibited > (cgroup/sock_create returns EPERM for AF_INET). Let's use > AF_LOCAL instead of AF_INET, it should perfectly work

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: use AF_LOCAL instead of AF_INET in xsk.c

2021-02-12 Thread sdf
On 02/12, Bj�rn T�pel wrote: On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 23:50, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > We have the environments where usage of AF_INET is prohibited > (cgroup/sock_create returns EPERM for AF_INET). Let's use > AF_LOCAL instead of AF_INET, it should perfectly work with SIOCETHTOOL. > > Signed-o

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: use AF_LOCAL instead of AF_INET in xsk.c

2021-02-11 Thread Björn Töpel
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 23:50, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > We have the environments where usage of AF_INET is prohibited > (cgroup/sock_create returns EPERM for AF_INET). Let's use > AF_LOCAL instead of AF_INET, it should perfectly work with SIOCETHTOOL. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev Sta