On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 10:35, Quentin Monnet wrote:
>
> 2020-07-14 22:12 UTC-0700 ~ Tony Ambardar
> > The bpftool sources include code to walk file trees, but use multiple
> > frameworks to do so: nftw and fts. While nftw conforms to POSIX/SUSv3 and
> > is widely available, fts is not conformant
2020-07-14 22:12 UTC-0700 ~ Tony Ambardar
> The bpftool sources include code to walk file trees, but use multiple
> frameworks to do so: nftw and fts. While nftw conforms to POSIX/SUSv3 and
> is widely available, fts is not conformant and less common, especially on
> non-glibc systems. The inconsi
The bpftool sources include code to walk file trees, but use multiple
frameworks to do so: nftw and fts. While nftw conforms to POSIX/SUSv3 and
is widely available, fts is not conformant and less common, especially on
non-glibc systems. The inconsistent framework usage hampers maintenance
and porta