On 03/02/2019 01:04 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:27 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 03/02/2019 12:22 AM, Song Liu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:10 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
[...]
>
> I see, so the *2 comes from
>
> BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_7)
Yes, exact
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:27 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> On 03/02/2019 12:22 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:10 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >>
> >> Add two additional tests for further asserting the
> >> BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER logic with cases that were missed
> >> previously.
> >>
On 03/02/2019 12:22 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:10 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>
>> Add two additional tests for further asserting the
>> BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER logic with cases that were missed
>> previously.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann
>> Cc: Marek Majkowski
>> Cc: Arth
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:10 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> Add two additional tests for further asserting the
> BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER logic with cases that were missed
> previously.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann
> Cc: Marek Majkowski
> Cc: Arthur Fabre
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/verifier/valu
Add two additional tests for further asserting the
BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER logic with cases that were missed
previously.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann
Cc: Marek Majkowski
Cc: Arthur Fabre
---
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c | 44 ++-
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+),