On 7/12/19 3:41 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> attach_probe test fails, because it cannot install a kprobe on a
> non-existent sys_nanosleep symbol.
>
> Use the correct symbol name for the nanosleep syscall on 64-bit s390.
> Don't bother adding one for 31-bit mode, since tests are compiled only
> i
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 6:42 AM Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>
> attach_probe test fails, because it cannot install a kprobe on a
> non-existent sys_nanosleep symbol.
>
> Use the correct symbol name for the nanosleep syscall on 64-bit s390.
> Don't bother adding one for 31-bit mode, since tests are com
attach_probe test fails, because it cannot install a kprobe on a
non-existent sys_nanosleep symbol.
Use the correct symbol name for the nanosleep syscall on 64-bit s390.
Don't bother adding one for 31-bit mode, since tests are compiled only
in 64-bit mode.
Fixes: 1e8611bbdfc9 ("selftests/bpf: add
