On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:32 PM Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/11/20 4:32 AM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > GCC 10 is very strict about symbol clash, and lwt_len_hist_user contains
> > a symbol which clashes with libbpf:
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple
> > d
On 5/11/20 4:32 AM, Matteo Croce wrote:
GCC 10 is very strict about symbol clash, and lwt_len_hist_user contains
a symbol which clashes with libbpf:
/usr/bin/ld: samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of
`bpf_log_buf'; samples/bpf/bpf_load.o:(.bss+0x8c0): first defin
GCC 10 is very strict about symbol clash, and lwt_len_hist_user contains
a symbol which clashes with libbpf:
/usr/bin/ld: samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of
`bpf_log_buf'; samples/bpf/bpf_load.o:(.bss+0x8c0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit s
