On 03/12/2018 22:04, Paul Burton wrote:
Hi Jiong,
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 04:10:01AM -0500, Jiong Wang wrote:
For micro-mips, srlv inside POOL32A encoding space should use 0x50
sub-opcode, NOT 0x90.
Some early version ISA doc describes the encoding as 0x90 for both srlv and
srav, this looks to
Hi Jiong,
On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 04:10:01AM -0500, Jiong Wang wrote:
> For micro-mips, srlv inside POOL32A encoding space should use 0x50
> sub-opcode, NOT 0x90.
>
> Some early version ISA doc describes the encoding as 0x90 for both srlv and
> srav, this looks to me was a typo. I checked Binutil
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 1:12 AM Jiong Wang wrote:
>
> For micro-mips, srlv inside POOL32A encoding space should use 0x50
> sub-opcode, NOT 0x90.
>
> Some early version ISA doc describes the encoding as 0x90 for both srlv and
> srav, this looks to me was a typo. I checked Binutils libopcode
> implem
For micro-mips, srlv inside POOL32A encoding space should use 0x50
sub-opcode, NOT 0x90.
Some early version ISA doc describes the encoding as 0x90 for both srlv and
srav, this looks to me was a typo. I checked Binutils libopcode
implementation which is using 0x50 for srlv and 0x90 for srav.
Fixes
