On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:24 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 17:19, Andrii Nakryiko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:17 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 15:16, Andrii Nakryiko
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:46 AM Lor
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 17:19, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:17 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 15:16, Andrii Nakryiko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:46 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 05:37, Andrii Nak
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:17 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 15:16, Andrii Nakryiko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:46 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 05:37, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Depending on used versions of libbpf, Clan
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 15:16, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:46 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 05:37, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > >
> > > Depending on used versions of libbpf, Clang, and kernel, it's possible to
> > > have valid BPF object files with v
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:46 AM Lorenz Bauer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 05:37, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > Depending on used versions of libbpf, Clang, and kernel, it's possible to
> > have valid BPF object files with valid BTF information, that still won't
> > load successfully due to
On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 05:37, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> Depending on used versions of libbpf, Clang, and kernel, it's possible to
> have valid BPF object files with valid BTF information, that still won't
> load successfully due to Clang emitting newer BTF features (e.g.,
> BTF_KIND_FUNC, .BTF.ex
Depending on used versions of libbpf, Clang, and kernel, it's possible to
have valid BPF object files with valid BTF information, that still won't
load successfully due to Clang emitting newer BTF features (e.g.,
BTF_KIND_FUNC, .BTF.ext's line_info/func_info, BTF_KIND_DATASEC, etc), that
are not ye