On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Is this really better? I don't see any point. I'd use my original patch other
> than this one. that said, there are just several lines of code, brutally
> 'abstract' them into a function doesn't make the code better.
The current ip6_make_flowlab
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 02:17:58PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >> > static inline __be32 ip6_make_flowlabel(struct net *net, s
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> > static inline __be32 ip6_make_flowlabel(struct net *net, struct sk_buff
>> > *skb,
>> >
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:35:02PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > static inline __be32 ip6_make_flowlabel(struct net *net, struct sk_buff
> > *skb,
> > __be32 flowlabel, bool autolabel,
> > -
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> static inline __be32 ip6_make_flowlabel(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> __be32 flowlabel, bool autolabel,
> - struct flowi6 *fl6)
> +
From: Shaohua Li
Please see below tcpdump output:
21:00:48.109122 IP6 (flowlabel 0x43304, hlim 64, next-header TCP (6) payload
length: 40) fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.55804 > fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.: Flags
[S], cksum 0x0529 (incorrect -> 0xf56c), seq 3282214508, win 43690, options
[mss 65476,
