From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:06:34 -0800
> On 01/31/2017 10:04 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> This entire series is being held up because there is still questions about
>> whether this is programming the internal PHYs and therefore whether the
>> code should be placed elsewher
On 31 January 2017 at 19:16, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:14:52 -0500 (EST)
>
>> From: Florian Fainelli
>> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:06:34 -0800
>>
>>> On 01/31/2017 10:04 AM, David Miller wrote:
This entire series is being held up because there
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:14:52 -0500 (EST)
> From: Florian Fainelli
> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:06:34 -0800
>
>> On 01/31/2017 10:04 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> This entire series is being held up because there is still questions about
>>> whether this is programming th
On 01/28/2017 01:08 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> This adds support for using bgmac with PHYs supported by standalone PHY
> drivers. Having any PHY initialization in bgmac is hacky and shouldn't
> be extended but rather removed if anyone has hardware to test it.
>
> Signed-o
On 01/31/2017 10:04 AM, David Miller wrote:
>
> This entire series is being held up because there is still questions about
> whether this is programming the internal PHYs and therefore whether the
> code should be placed elsewhere.
>
> Can we please move the discussion forward?
The patches are g
This entire series is being held up because there is still questions about
whether this is programming the internal PHYs and therefore whether the
code should be placed elsewhere.
Can we please move the discussion forward?
Thank you.
On 01/29/2017 11:02 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 29 January 2017 at 23:36, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Le 01/29/17 à 13:31, Rafał Miłecki a écrit :
>>> On 29 January 2017 at 21:22, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 01/29/2017 12:14 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 04:08 AM, Florian Fain
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 01/28/2017 01:08 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki
>>
>> This adds support for using bgmac with PHYs supported by standalone PHY
>> drivers. Having any PHY initialization in bgmac is hacky and shouldn't
>> be extende
On 29 January 2017 at 23:36, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 01/29/17 à 13:31, Rafał Miłecki a écrit :
>> On 29 January 2017 at 21:22, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 01/29/2017 12:14 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 01/29/2017 04:08 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 01/28/2017 01:08 PM, Rafał Mił
Le 01/29/17 à 13:31, Rafał Miłecki a écrit :
> On 29 January 2017 at 21:22, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 01/29/2017 12:14 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 01/29/2017 04:08 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 01/28/2017 01:08 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> This adds
On 29 January 2017 at 21:22, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 12:14 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 01/29/2017 04:08 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 01/28/2017 01:08 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
This adds support for using bgmac with PHYs supported by stand
On 01/29/2017 04:08 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 01/28/2017 01:08 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
This adds support for using bgmac with PHYs supported by standalone PHY
drivers. Having any PHY initialization in bgmac is hacky and shouldn't
be extended but rather removed if anyo
On 01/28/2017 01:08 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> This adds support for using bgmac with PHYs supported by standalone PHY
> drivers. Having any PHY initialization in bgmac is hacky and shouldn't
> be extended but rather removed if anyone has hardware to test it.
>
> Signed
From: Rafał Miłecki
This adds support for using bgmac with PHYs supported by standalone PHY
drivers. Having any PHY initialization in bgmac is hacky and shouldn't
be extended but rather removed if anyone has hardware to test it.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bg
14 matches
Mail list logo
