Am 16.11.2017 um 10:51 schrieb Ard Biesheuvel:
> On 15 November 2017 at 22:19, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Am 15.11.2017 um 23:04 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>>> On 11/12/2017 01:08 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from
sleeping de
On 15 November 2017 at 22:19, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 15.11.2017 um 23:04 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>> On 11/12/2017 01:08 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from
>>> sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded interrupt
Am 15.11.2017 um 23:04 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> On 11/12/2017 01:08 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from
>> sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow
>> some simplification" all relevant code pieces ru
On 11/12/2017 01:08 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from
> sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow
> some simplification" all relevant code pieces run in process context
> anyway and I don't think we nee
After commits c974bdbc3e "net: phy: Use threaded IRQ, to allow IRQ from
sleeping devices" and 664fcf123a30 "net: phy: Threaded interrupts allow
some simplification" all relevant code pieces run in process context
anyway and I don't think we need the disabling of interrupts any longer.
Interestingl
