On 5/9/17 2:50 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Your initial patch tried to make those interfaces transparent, this is not the
> case anymore here. It would probably be useful to be able to filter those
> interfaces in the kernel during a dump.
The earlier email was for hidden devices; the intent ther
Le 08/05/2017 à 19:35, Florian Fainelli a écrit :
> On 05/06/2017 09:07 AM, David Ahern wrote:
>> As I have mentioned many times[1], at ~43+kB per instance the use of
>> net_devices does not scale for deployments needing 10,000+ devices. At
>> netconf 1.2 there was a discussion about using a net_de
On 05/06/2017 09:07 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> As I have mentioned many times[1], at ~43+kB per instance the use of
> net_devices does not scale for deployments needing 10,000+ devices. At
> netconf 1.2 there was a discussion about using a net_device_common for
> the minimal set of common attributes
As I have mentioned many times[1], at ~43+kB per instance the use of
net_devices does not scale for deployments needing 10,000+ devices. At
netconf 1.2 there was a discussion about using a net_device_common for
the minimal set of common attributes with other structs built on top of
that one for "fu
