Re: [PATCH RFC 6/7] net: phy: split devices_in_package

2020-05-26 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:47:54PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:39:08AM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 5/26/20 9:31 AM, Russell King wrote: > > > We have two competing requirements for the devices_in_package field. > > > We want to use i

Re: [PATCH RFC 6/7] net: phy: split devices_in_package

2020-05-26 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:39:08AM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote: > Hi, > > On 5/26/20 9:31 AM, Russell King wrote: > > We have two competing requirements for the devices_in_package field. > > We want to use it as a bit array indicating which MMDs are present, but > > we also want to know if the Clau

Re: [PATCH RFC 6/7] net: phy: split devices_in_package

2020-05-26 Thread Jeremy Linton
Hi, On 5/26/20 9:31 AM, Russell King wrote: We have two competing requirements for the devices_in_package field. We want to use it as a bit array indicating which MMDs are present, but we also want to know if the Clause 22 registers are present. Since "devices in package" is a term used in the

[PATCH RFC 6/7] net: phy: split devices_in_package

2020-05-26 Thread Russell King
We have two competing requirements for the devices_in_package field. We want to use it as a bit array indicating which MMDs are present, but we also want to know if the Clause 22 registers are present. Since "devices in package" is a term used in the 802.3 specification, keep this as the as-specif