Re: [PATCH RFC 01/11] net/mlx5e: Single flow order-0 pages for Striding RQ

2016-09-15 Thread Tariq Toukan
Hi Alexei, On 07/09/2016 8:31 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 03:42:22PM +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote: From: Tariq Toukan To improve the memory consumption scheme, we omit the flow that demands and splits high-order pages in Striding RQ, and stay with a single Striding RQ

Re: [PATCH RFC 01/11] net/mlx5e: Single flow order-0 pages for Striding RQ

2016-09-15 Thread Tariq Toukan
Hi Jesper, On 07/09/2016 10:18 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:42:22 +0300 Saeed Mahameed wrote: From: Tariq Toukan To improve the memory consumption scheme, we omit the flow that demands and splits high-order pages in Striding RQ, and stay with a single Striding R

Re: [PATCH RFC 01/11] net/mlx5e: Single flow order-0 pages for Striding RQ

2016-09-07 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:42:22 +0300 Saeed Mahameed wrote: > From: Tariq Toukan > > To improve the memory consumption scheme, we omit the flow that > demands and splits high-order pages in Striding RQ, and stay > with a single Striding RQ flow that uses order-0 pages. Thanks you for doing this!

Re: [PATCH RFC 01/11] net/mlx5e: Single flow order-0 pages for Striding RQ

2016-09-07 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 03:42:22PM +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > From: Tariq Toukan > > To improve the memory consumption scheme, we omit the flow that > demands and splits high-order pages in Striding RQ, and stay > with a single Striding RQ flow that uses order-0 pages. > > Moving to fragment

[PATCH RFC 01/11] net/mlx5e: Single flow order-0 pages for Striding RQ

2016-09-07 Thread Saeed Mahameed
From: Tariq Toukan To improve the memory consumption scheme, we omit the flow that demands and splits high-order pages in Striding RQ, and stay with a single Striding RQ flow that uses order-0 pages. Moving to fragmented memory allows the use of larger MPWQEs, which reduces the number of UMR pos