Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] veth, bridge, and GSO maximums

2017-11-30 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:47:21 -0500 (EST) > David Miller wrote: > >> From: Stephen Hemminger >> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 10:17:47 -0800 >> >> > This pair of patchesimproves the performance when running >> > containers in an environment whe

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] veth, bridge, and GSO maximums

2017-11-30 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:47:21 -0500 (EST) David Miller wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 10:17:47 -0800 > > > This pair of patchesimproves the performance when running > > containers in an environment where underlying device has lower > > GSO maximum (such as Azure). > >

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] veth, bridge, and GSO maximums

2017-11-30 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 10:17:47 -0800 > This pair of patchesimproves the performance when running > containers in an environment where underlying device has lower > GSO maximum (such as Azure). > > With containers a veth pair is created and one end is attached > to the br

[PATCH RFC 0/2] veth, bridge, and GSO maximums

2017-11-26 Thread Stephen Hemminger
This pair of patchesimproves the performance when running containers in an environment where underlying device has lower GSO maximum (such as Azure). With containers a veth pair is created and one end is attached to the bridge device. The bridge device correctly reports computes GSO parameters tha