On 06.09.2018 08:24, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
wrote:
On 02.09.2018 12:29, Tariq Toukan wrote:
On 31/08/2018 2:29 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
XOR (MLX5_RX_HASH_FN_INVERTED_XOR8) gives only 8 bits.
It seems not enough for RFS. All o
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
wrote:
> On 02.09.2018 12:29, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 31/08/2018 2:29 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>>
>>> XOR (MLX5_RX_HASH_FN_INVERTED_XOR8) gives only 8 bits.
>>> It seems not enough for RFS. All other drivers use toeplitz.
>>
On 02.09.2018 12:29, Tariq Toukan wrote:
On 31/08/2018 2:29 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
XOR (MLX5_RX_HASH_FN_INVERTED_XOR8) gives only 8 bits.
It seems not enough for RFS. All other drivers use toeplitz.
Driver mlx4_en uses Toeplitz by default and warns if hash XOR is used
together with
On 31/08/2018 2:29 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
XOR (MLX5_RX_HASH_FN_INVERTED_XOR8) gives only 8 bits.
It seems not enough for RFS. All other drivers use toeplitz.
Driver mlx4_en uses Toeplitz by default and warns if hash XOR is used
together with NETIF_F_RXHASH (enabled by default too):
XOR (MLX5_RX_HASH_FN_INVERTED_XOR8) gives only 8 bits.
It seems not enough for RFS. All other drivers use toeplitz.
Driver mlx4_en uses Toeplitz by default and warns if hash XOR is used
together with NETIF_F_RXHASH (enabled by default too): "Enabling both
XOR Hash function and RX Hashing can limit