On 4/17/21 12:52, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote:
>
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
>> multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
>> the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the
>> code fall through to
On 4/17/21 3:24 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>
> On 4/17/21 13:29, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 3/10/21 3:59 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:51:24PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 3/10/21 2:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:31:57PM -0500, Jes Sorens
On 4/17/21 8:09 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-17 at 14:30 -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 4/17/21 1:52 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote:
>>>
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ c
On Sat, 2021-04-17 at 14:30 -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 4/17/21 1:52 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote:
> >
> > > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
> > > multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
> > > the new pseudo-keywo
On 4/17/21 13:29, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 3/10/21 3:59 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:51:24PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>> On 3/10/21 2:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:31:57PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 3/10/21 2:14 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>>
On 4/17/21 1:52 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote:
>
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
>> multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
>> the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the
>> code fall through to t
On 3/10/21 3:59 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:51:24PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 3/10/21 2:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:31:57PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 3/10/21 2:14 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hm, this conversation looks like a miscommun
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
> multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
> the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the
> code fall through to the next case.
>
> Notice that Clang doesn't r
On 3/11/21 01:00, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Kees Cook writes:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
>>>
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments wi
Kees Cook writes:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
>>
>> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
>> > multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
>> > the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthro
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:51:24PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 3/10/21 2:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:31:57PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >> On 3/10/21 2:14 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>> Hm, this conversation looks like a miscommunication, mainly? I see
> >>> Gustavo, as
On 3/10/21 2:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:31:57PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 3/10/21 2:14 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> Hm, this conversation looks like a miscommunication, mainly? I see
>>> Gustavo, as requested by many others[1], replacing the fallthrough
>>> comments wit
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:31:57PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 3/10/21 2:14 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
> >>
> >>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
> >>> multiple warnings
On 3/10/21 2:14 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
>>
>>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
>>> multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
>>> the new pseudo-keyword m
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
>
> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
> > multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
> > the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the
On 3/5/21 07:40, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
>
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
>> multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
>> the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the
>> code fall through to
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" writes:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
> multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
> the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the
> code fall through to the next case.
>
> Notice that Clang doesn't r
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the
code fall through to the next case.
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
imp
18 matches
Mail list logo
