On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:24:24PM +, Edward Cree wrote:
On 26/10/2020 23:47, Sasha Levin wrote:
From: Edward Cree
[ Upstream commit 1c0544d24927e4fad04f858216b8ea767a3bd123 ]
Instead of using efx_tx_queue_partner(), which relies on the assumption
that tx_queues_per_channel is 2, efx_tx_
On 26/10/2020 23:47, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Edward Cree
>
> [ Upstream commit 1c0544d24927e4fad04f858216b8ea767a3bd123 ]
>
> Instead of using efx_tx_queue_partner(), which relies on the assumption
> that tx_queues_per_channel is 2, efx_tx_send_pending() iterates over
> txqs with efx_for_each
From: Edward Cree
[ Upstream commit 1c0544d24927e4fad04f858216b8ea767a3bd123 ]
Instead of using efx_tx_queue_partner(), which relies on the assumption
that tx_queues_per_channel is 2, efx_tx_send_pending() iterates over
txqs with efx_for_each_channel_tx_queue().
We unconditionally set tx_queue