On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 09:53:04AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:07:41PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > This patch makes the wext bits in struct net_device depend on
> > CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I persona
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 09:53 -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> I personally would not do that. Having conditional fields in
> "struct net_device" is very bad, it's a sure way to crash on modules
> in some cases. If I remember well, Jeff Garzik has been fighting those
> over the years.
I'm fine
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:07:41PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> This patch makes the wext bits in struct net_device depend on
> CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I personally would not do that. Having conditional fields in
"struct net_device" is ve
This patch makes the wext bits in struct net_device depend on
CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- net-2.6.22.orig/include/linux/netdevice.h 2007-04-24 19:36:59.248804
