Hi Dominik,
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 10:56 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Like this?
Yes, but I usually drop revisions from the matched IDs, especially in
presence of the chip ID. Why would we exclude "RevB" if it happens to
be ISL37300P based? So the new entries would be:
PCMCIA_DEVI
Hi Pavel,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 05:18:43PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 21:59 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > - PCMCIA_DEVICE_MANF_CARD(0xc00f, 0x),
> > +/* PCMCIA_DEVICE_MANF_CARD(0xc00f, 0x),conflict with pcnet_cs */
>
> That's fine if we also add symbo
Hi Dominik,
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 21:59 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> - PCMCIA_DEVICE_MANF_CARD(0xc00f, 0x),
> +/* PCMCIA_DEVICE_MANF_CARD(0xc00f, 0x),conflict with pcnet_cs */
That's fine if we also add symbolic names. I could identify two
hostap_cs compatible cards using
From: Komuro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:41:21 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: hostap_cs.c - 0xc00f,0x conflicts with pcnet_cs
Comment out the ID 0xc00f,0x in hostap_cs.c, as it conflicts with the
pcnet_cs driver.
Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dominik B
