From: Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:37:50 +0200
> From: Allan Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch tivially re-orders the entries in TIPC's list of local
> publications so that applications will receive publication events
> in the order they were published.
>
> S
From: Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:50:40 +0200 (CEST)
> I'm fairly sure this is a problem on your side. I received patch 10/14
> from the netdev list and the two list archives I checked also had it.
I also got 2 copies which means it hit netdev for me too.
-
To unsubsc
I'm fairly sure this is a problem on your side. I received patch 10/14
from the netdev list and the two list archives I checked also had it.
/Per
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Bill Fink wrote:
> FYI,
>
> At least here, I received two copies of patch 9/14 and no copy
> of patch 10/14.
>
>
FYI,
At least here, I received two copies of patch 9/14 and no copy
of patch 10/14.
-Bill
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:37:50 +0200, Per Liden wrote:
> From: Allan Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This patch tivially re-orders the entries in TIPC's li
From: Allan Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This patch tivially re-orders the entries in TIPC's list of local
publications so that applications will receive publication events
in the order they were published.
Signed-off-by: Allan Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECT
