From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:08:24 +0800
> [IPSEC]: Make sure idev is consistent with dev in xfrm_dst
>
> Previously we took the device from the bottom route and idev from the top
> route. This is bad because idev may well point to a different device.
> This pat
[IPSEC]: Make sure idev is consistent with dev in xfrm_dst
Previously we took the device from the bottom route and idev from the top
route. This is bad because idev may well point to a different device.
This patch changes it so that we get the idev from the device directly.
It also makes it an e
