Re: [PATCH 50/59] sysctl: Move utsname sysctls to their own file

2007-01-22 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:31:22PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Eric, though I personally don't care much: > > 1. I ask for not setting your authorship/copyright on the code which you > > just > > copied > > from other places. Just doesn't

Re: [PATCH 50/59] sysctl: Move utsname sysctls to their own file

2007-01-17 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Eric, though I personally don't care much: > 1. I ask for not setting your authorship/copyright on the code which you just > copied > from other places. Just doesn't look polite IMHO. I can't claim complete ownership of the code, there was plenty of

Re: [PATCH 50/59] sysctl: Move utsname sysctls to their own file

2007-01-17 Thread Kirill Korotaev
Eric, though I personally don't care much: 1. I ask for not setting your authorship/copyright on the code which you just copied from other places. Just doesn't look polite IMHO. 2. I would propose to not introduce utsname_sysctl.c. both files are too small and minor that I can't see much reaso

[PATCH 50/59] sysctl: Move utsname sysctls to their own file

2007-01-16 Thread Eric W. Biederman
From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted This is just a simple cleanup to keep kernel/sysctl.c from getting to crowded with special cases, and by keeping all of the utsname logic to together it makes the code a little more readable. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED