On 05/26/2017 09:20 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 05/26/2017 12:09 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 05/26/2017 05:39 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 05/26/2017 08:14 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 05/26/2017 02:38 AM, David Daney wrote:
Since the eBPF machine has 64-bit registers, we only support this in
6
On 05/26/2017 12:09 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 05/26/2017 05:39 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 05/26/2017 08:14 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 05/26/2017 02:38 AM, David Daney wrote:
Since the eBPF machine has 64-bit registers, we only support this in
64-bit kernels. As of the writing of this co
On 05/26/2017 05:39 PM, David Daney wrote:
On 05/26/2017 08:14 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 05/26/2017 02:38 AM, David Daney wrote:
Since the eBPF machine has 64-bit registers, we only support this in
64-bit kernels. As of the writing of this commit log test-bpf is showing:
test_bpf: Summ
Hi David,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc2]
[cannot apply to next-20170526]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/David-Daney/MIPS-Implement-e
On 05/25/2017 07:23 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:38:26PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
Since the eBPF machine has 64-bit registers, we only support this in
64-bit kernels. As of the writing of this commit log test-bpf is showing:
test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAIL
On 05/26/2017 08:14 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 05/26/2017 02:38 AM, David Daney wrote:
Since the eBPF machine has 64-bit registers, we only support this in
64-bit kernels. As of the writing of this commit log test-bpf is
showing:
test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [308/308 JIT'ed
On 05/26/2017 05:14 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 05/26/2017 02:38 AM, David Daney wrote:
Since the eBPF machine has 64-bit registers, we only support this in
64-bit kernels. As of the writing of this commit log test-bpf is showing:
test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [308/308 JIT'ed]
From: David Daney
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 17:38:26 -0700
> +static int gen_int_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> + int stack_adjust = 0;
> + int store_offset;
> + int locals_size;
> +
> + if (ctx->flags & EBPF_SAVE_RA)
> + /*
> + * If RA we are doing a f
On 05/26/2017 02:38 AM, David Daney wrote:
Since the eBPF machine has 64-bit registers, we only support this in
64-bit kernels. As of the writing of this commit log test-bpf is showing:
test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [308/308 JIT'ed]
All current test cases are successfully compile
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 05:38:26PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> Since the eBPF machine has 64-bit registers, we only support this in
> 64-bit kernels. As of the writing of this commit log test-bpf is showing:
>
> test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [308/308 JIT'ed]
>
> All current test cas
Since the eBPF machine has 64-bit registers, we only support this in
64-bit kernels. As of the writing of this commit log test-bpf is showing:
test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [308/308 JIT'ed]
All current test cases are successfully compiled.
Signed-off-by: David Daney
---
arch/mips
11 matches
Mail list logo
