On 05/26/2018 09:46 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> The change fixes a sleep in atomic context issue, which can be
>> always triggered by running 'ethtool -r' command, because
>> phy_start_aneg() protects phydev fields by a mutex.
>
>Again, I'm unable to reproduce this BUG()...
Now I can! I
On 05/24/2018 02:11 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> The change fixes a sleep in atomic context issue, which can be
> always triggered by running 'ethtool -r' command, because
> phy_start_aneg() protects phydev fields by a mutex.
Again, I'm unable to reproduce this BUG()...
> Another note is t
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 02:11:56PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> The change fixes a sleep in atomic context issue, which can be
> always triggered by running 'ethtool -r' command, because
> phy_start_aneg() protects phydev fields by a mutex.
>
> Another note is that the change implicitly repl
The change fixes a sleep in atomic context issue, which can be
always triggered by running 'ethtool -r' command, because
phy_start_aneg() protects phydev fields by a mutex.
Another note is that the change implicitly replaces phy_start_aneg()
with a newer phy_restart_aneg().
Signed-off-by: Vladimi
