On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:16:32 +0300
>
> > SACK processing code has been a sort of russian roulette as no
> > validation of SACK blocks is previously attempted. Besides, it
> > is not very clear what all kinds
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:16:32 +0300
> SACK processing code has been a sort of russian roulette as no
> validation of SACK blocks is previously attempted. Besides, it
> is not very clear what all kinds of broken SACK blocks really
> mean (e.g., one that h
From: =?ISO-8859-1?q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SACK processing code has been a sort of russian roulette as no
validation of SACK blocks is previously attempted. Besides, it
is not very clear what all kinds of broken SACK blocks really
mean (e.g., one that has start and end sequence num
