Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 12:28:26PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> Can you provide some bonding configuration details? Which mode,
>>options, etc, as well as the relevant bits from dmesg (you can send it
>> to me privately if it's huge)?
>
>I think I s
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 12:28:26PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Can you provide some bonding configuration details? Which mode,
options, etc, as well as the relevant bits from dmesg (you can send it
to me privately if it's huge)?
I think I sent another message that I'm just doing
ifen
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The skge 1.9 patch is looking good on older syskonnect fiber cards.
>Stability issues seem to be taken care of and performance is good. There
>are some strange interactions with bonding, however. If I try to put both
>interfaces of an sk-9844 into a bonded
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:18:07AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Do both ports report carrier present?
ethtool eth2
ethtool eth3
Link detected? yes
Mike Stone
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mor
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:58:31 -0500
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:51:04AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >Which form of bonding link checking are you using. It could be that
> >bonding MII checking is confused.
>
> I'm not specifying anything, just "ifens
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:51:04AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Which form of bonding link checking are you using. It could be that
bonding MII checking is confused.
I'm not specifying anything, just "ifenslave bond0 eth2 eth3"
Mike Stone
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 08:25:07 -0500
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The skge 1.9 patch is looking good on older syskonnect fiber cards.
> Stability issues seem to be taken care of and performance is good. There
> are some strange interactions with bonding, however. If I try to put
>
The skge 1.9 patch is looking good on older syskonnect fiber cards.
Stability issues seem to be taken care of and performance is good. There
are some strange interactions with bonding, however. If I try to put
both interfaces of an sk-9844 into a bonded interface, I only see
traffic from one o
Want to be able to track downstream impact of fiber related
fixes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/skge.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/skge.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
#include "skge.h"
#define DRV_NAME "skge"
-#define DRV_VERSION
