On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:27:27PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:17:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:10:54AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Reason I ask is since I noticed a while ago a lot of drivers
> > > were using info->fix.sm
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:17:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:10:54AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Reason I ask is since I noticed a while ago a lot of drivers
> > were using info->fix.smem_start and info->fix.smem_len consistently
> > for their ioremap'd areas
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:10:54AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Reason I ask is since I noticed a while ago a lot of drivers
> were using info->fix.smem_start and info->fix.smem_len consistently
> for their ioremap'd areas it might make sense instead to let the
> internal framebuffer (register
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:10:54AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:33:58PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> > index 6ce2c31b9a81..9ef47329e8ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:33:58PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 6ce2c31b9a81..9ef47329e8ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -3346,6 +3346,15 @@ static vo
