Re: [PATCH 3/9] d80211: better deallocation of mdev

2006-07-19 Thread Jiri Benc
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:07:34 -0700, Simon Barber wrote: > I have been thinking about a slightly different approach for the master > device. Since the master device represents the physical hardware, I am > thinking that the hardware driver could register the master device > directly itself. It would

RE: [PATCH 3/9] d80211: better deallocation of mdev

2006-07-18 Thread Simon Barber
function would be the real hardware drivers transmit function. What do you think? Simon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jiri Benc Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 8:45 AM To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 3/9] d80211: better

[PATCH 3/9] d80211: better deallocation of mdev

2006-07-18 Thread Jiri Benc
Master device and ieee80211_local are allocated separately now, so master device can be freed by the same function as other virtual interfaces. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/d80211/ieee80211.c |2 +- net/d80211/ieee80211_iface.c |3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 in