From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:02:57 +0800
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:17:17PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > Could you submit a 2.6.23 version of just the ipv4 fix?
> > It might be interesting to determine why it was omitted,
> > perhaps it was an oversight, a
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:17:17PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> Could you submit a 2.6.23 version of just the ipv4 fix?
> It might be interesting to determine why it was omitted,
> perhaps it was an oversight, and it probably predates the
> addition of skb_reset_*().
OK I double-checked and it
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:29:39 +0800
> [IPSEC]: Move common output code to xfrm_output
>
> Most of the code in xfrm4_output_one and xfrm6_output_one are identical so
> this patch moves them into a common xfrm_output function which will live
> in net/xfrm.
>
[IPSEC]: Move common output code to xfrm_output
Most of the code in xfrm4_output_one and xfrm6_output_one are identical so
this patch moves them into a common xfrm_output function which will live
in net/xfrm.
In fact this would seem to fix a bug as on IPv4 we never reset the network
header after
