Re: [PATCH 3/6] d80211: fix classify_1d() priority selection

2006-12-15 Thread Jiri Benc
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:02:27 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > I don't see any reason why packets with DSCP=0x40 should have lower IEEE > 802.1D priority than packets with DSCP=0x20. Spare > Background. No? Applied to my tree, thanks. I also applied the following patch on top of it: -- Subject: [PATCH] d80

Re: [PATCH 3/6] d80211: fix classify_1d() priority selection

2006-12-14 Thread Jiri Benc
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:02:27 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > I don't see any reason why packets with DSCP=0x40 should have lower IEEE > 802.1D priority than packets with DSCP=0x20. Spare > Background. No? Hm, seems so. Jouni, is there any reason for this? > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

[PATCH 3/6] d80211: fix classify_1d() priority selection

2006-12-13 Thread Zhu Yi
I don't see any reason why packets with DSCP=0x40 should have lower IEEE 802.1D priority than packets with DSCP=0x20. Spare > Background. No? Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/d80211/wme.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) e1765ea0d80ad86619300d3253e