On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:21 PM Guedes, Andre wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 2019, at 12:36 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > Yeah, so we can just remove it. :)
>
> Fine by me. In that case, the function should_restart_cycle() will be just a
> dummy wrapper on list_is_last() so we should probably get rid of
> On Apr 22, 2019, at 12:36 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:24 PM Guedes, Andre wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 22, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:04 AM Cong Wang wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:06 PM Andre Guedes
wrot
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:24 PM Guedes, Andre wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:04 AM Cong Wang wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:06 PM Andre Guedes
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If 'entry' is NULL we WARN_ON() but dereference
> On Apr 22, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:04 AM Cong Wang wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:06 PM Andre Guedes wrote:
>>>
>>> If 'entry' is NULL we WARN_ON() but dereference the pointer anyway,
>>> generating a null pointer dereference bug. This pa
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 11:04 AM Cong Wang wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:06 PM Andre Guedes wrote:
> >
> > If 'entry' is NULL we WARN_ON() but dereference the pointer anyway,
> > generating a null pointer dereference bug. This patch fixes should_
> > restart_cycle() so we return if the poi
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:06 PM Andre Guedes wrote:
>
> If 'entry' is NULL we WARN_ON() but dereference the pointer anyway,
> generating a null pointer dereference bug. This patch fixes should_
> restart_cycle() so we return if the pointer is NULL.
Hmm, while you are on it, how is it possible to
If 'entry' is NULL we WARN_ON() but dereference the pointer anyway,
generating a null pointer dereference bug. This patch fixes should_
restart_cycle() so we return if the pointer is NULL.
Fixes: 5a781ccbd19e (“tc: Add support for configuring the taprio scheduler”)
Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes
---
