On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 11:25 +, David Laight wrote:
> > Actually, with the new system where it's not const, I could even
> > split this up and submit per subsystem, i.e. the fourth patch
> > doesn't depend on it. I thought it would, since I wanted to make it
> > const, but since I failed it doe
From: Johannes Berg
> Sent: 24 October 2016 13:56
> On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 14:40 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > From: Johannes Berg
> >
> > Instead of providing macros/inline functions to initialize
> > the families, make all users initialize them statically and
> > get rid of the macros.
> >
> >
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 14:40 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg
>
> Instead of providing macros/inline functions to initialize
> the families, make all users initialize them statically and
> get rid of the macros.
>
> This reduces the kernel code size by about 1.6k on x86-64
> (wit
From: Johannes Berg
Instead of providing macros/inline functions to initialize
the families, make all users initialize them statically and
get rid of the macros.
This reduces the kernel code size by about 1.6k on x86-64
(with allyesconfig).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg
---
drivers/acpi/event.
