Venki Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> If this does not work:
> Another option is to use 'deferrable timer' here which will be called at
> same as before time when CPU is busy and on idle CPU it will be delayed until
> CPU comes out of idle due to any other events.
That would sound like
From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:36:12 -0500
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:29:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:10:39 -0500
> >
> > > Are you agreeing that "it seems wasteful to add per-packet ov
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:29:39PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:10:39 -0500
>
> > Are you agreeing that "it seems wasteful to add per-packet overhead"?
> > This patch is not doing that.
>
> Yes, and I know that :-)
Is there a rea
From: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:10:39 -0500
> Are you agreeing that "it seems wasteful to add per-packet overhead"?
> This patch is not doing that.
Yes, and I know that :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a messag
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:55:51PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:42:32 +0200
>
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >>>Index: linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > >>>=
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:30:39PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 12:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:42:32 +0200
> >
> > > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > >>>Index: linu
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 12:55:51PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:42:32 +0200
>
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >>>Index: linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > >>>=
On Wed, 30 May 2007 12:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:42:32 +0200
>
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >>>Index: linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > >>>=
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:42:32 +0200
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>>Index: linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> >>>===
> >>>--- linux-2.6.22-rc-mm.orig/net/sched/sch_generic.c
Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:42:32PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>
>>It seems wasteful to add per-packet overhead for tx timeouts, which
>>should be an exception. Do drivers really care about the exact
>>timeout value? Compared to a packet transmission time its incredib
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:42:32PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>>Index: linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> >>>===
> >>>--- linux-2.6.22-rc-mm.orig/net/sched/sch_generic.c2007-05-24
> >
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>Index: linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c
>>>===
>>>--- linux-2.6.22-rc-mm.orig/net/sched/sch_generic.c 2007-05-24
>>>11:16:03.0 -0700
>>>+++ linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c
On Wed, 30 May 2007 10:59:36 -0700
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2007 11:01:13 -0700
> Venki Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > round_jiffies for net dev watchdog timer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.2
On Tue, 29 May 2007 11:01:13 -0700
Venki Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> round_jiffies for net dev watchdog timer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> ===
14 matches
Mail list logo
