From: Eric Dumazet
> Sent: 07 August 2020 19:29
>
> On 8/7/20 2:18 AM, David Laight wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >> Sent: 06 August 2020 23:21
> >>
> >> On 7/22/20 11:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>> Rework the remaining setsockopt code to pass a sockptr_t instead of a
> >>> plain user poi
On 8/7/20 2:18 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>> Sent: 06 August 2020 23:21
>>
>> On 7/22/20 11:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Rework the remaining setsockopt code to pass a sockptr_t instead of a
>>> plain user pointer. This removes the last remaining set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
>>> o
From: Eric Dumazet
> Sent: 06 August 2020 23:21
>
> On 7/22/20 11:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Rework the remaining setsockopt code to pass a sockptr_t instead of a
> > plain user pointer. This removes the last remaining set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
> > outside of architecture specific code.
> >
> >
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 03:21:25PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> converting get_user(...) to copy_from_sockptr(...) really assumed the
> optlen
> has been validated to be >= sizeof(int) earlier.
>
> Which is not always the case, for example here.
Yes. And besides the bpfilter mess the main re
On 7/22/20 11:09 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Rework the remaining setsockopt code to pass a sockptr_t instead of a
> plain user pointer. This removes the last remaining set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
> outside of architecture specific code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Acked-by: Stefan Schmid
Hi Christoph,
On 23/07/2020 08:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Rework the remaining setsockopt code to pass a sockptr_t instead of a
plain user pointer. This removes the last remaining set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
outside of architecture specific code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: Stefan Schm
Rework the remaining setsockopt code to pass a sockptr_t instead of a
plain user pointer. This removes the last remaining set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
outside of architecture specific code.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: Stefan Schmidt [ieee802154]
---
crypto/af_alg.c
