Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I don't think you should need any of these. seq_file_net or
> seq_file_single_net will return you the net_ns based on a struct
> seq_file. And even from your write routines you can reach the
> seq_file in file->private pretty easily.
You've taken away things like sin
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:29:34PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells wrote:
>
> > > Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and
> > > unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use
> > > proc_create_seq where applicable.
> >
> > Note that thi
David Howells wrote:
> > Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and
> > unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use
> > proc_create_seq where applicable.
>
> Note that this is likely going to clash with my patch to net-namespace all of
> the afs pr
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and
> unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use
> proc_create_seq where applicable.
Note that this is likely going to clash with my patch to net-namespace all of
the afs proc files
Use remove_proc_subtree to remove the whole subtree on cleanup, and
unwind the registration loop into individual calls. Switch to use
proc_create_seq where applicable.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
fs/afs/proc.c | 134 ++
1 file changed, 15
