Roland Dreier wrote:
Looks OK to me but I would just roll up the second patch into the
first patch and let Jeff merge it as one commit. There's no point in
creating an intermediate tree that doesn't build -- it just breaks git
bisect for no useful purpose.
Okay, Jeff agrees too, I'll do so.
Roland Dreier wrote:
Looks OK to me but I would just roll up the second patch into the
first patch and let Jeff merge it as one commit. There's no point in
creating an intermediate tree that doesn't build -- it just breaks git
bisect for no useful purpose.
Agreed -- this needs to be in a singl
Looks OK to me but I would just roll up the second patch into the
first patch and let Jeff merge it as one commit. There's no point in
creating an intermediate tree that doesn't build -- it just breaks git
bisect for no useful purpose.
Also as a side note, when trying to test this I got the messa
Jeff/Roland,
I'm resubmitting the cxgb3 dev->priv fix for inclusion in 2.6.23.
I also submit a follow-up patch for the iw_cxgb3 driver that fixes
the previous infiniband breakage.
Cheers,
Divy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
