Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3 1/2] ehea: kzalloc GFP_ATOMIC fix

2006-10-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: This patch fixes kzalloc parameters (GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL) Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> applied to #upstream-fixes In the future, please include a description of -why- patches like this are needed (I got the info from your replies

Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3 1/2] ehea: kzalloc GFP_ATOMIC fix

2006-10-27 Thread Christoph Raisch
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 27.10.2006 05:13:13: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:11:42 +0200 > Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This patch fixes kzalloc parameters (GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL) > > why? these few kcallocs run in atomic context in some situations.

Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3 1/2] ehea: kzalloc GFP_ATOMIC fix

2006-10-26 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:11:42 +0200 Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch fixes kzalloc parameters (GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL) why? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at h

[PATCH 2.6.19-rc3 1/2] ehea: kzalloc GFP_ATOMIC fix

2006-10-25 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
This patch fixes kzalloc parameters (GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL) Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c index eb7d44d..4538c99 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_mai